[Coco] 6809 compilers

[William Astle]

I don't currently have a windows system to test with. I don't think the 
resulting binaries still require the mingw system to run. They should 
only depend on the standard C library which you probably already have. 
You certainly need mingw and msys to compile lwtools but if you obtain a 
contributed binary, what it requires will depend on how it was compiled. 
Tormod's contributed binaries were built with mingw.

By the way, the source files you linked to will probably require a bit 
of tweaking to assemble with lwasm. Notably, lwasm does not ship with an 
os9defs file so you'll have to acquire an appropriate one from 
somewhere. It does, however, support building OS9 modules.


On 14-08-06 08:02 PM, Kandur wrote:
> Thank you William,
> It appears, that the mingw and the basic msys system
> has to be installed in order to be able to use lwtools.
> Am I correct?
> Looks like it is a very well written and maintained product.
> (2014-04-11: LWTOOLS 4.10)
>
> Kandur
>
> Wednesday, August 6, 2014, 5:05:10 PM, you wrote:
>> In addition to others mentioned, you might also consider lwtools. It doesn't
>> have a gui but it does work on Windows. It doesn't compile c or anything like
>> that but it does support  assembling to object files and then linking.
>
>> Lwtools is at http://lwtools.projects.l-w.ca
>
>
>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Kandur <k at qdv.pw>
>> Date: 2014-08-06  17:07  (GMT-07:00)
>> To: coco at maltedmedia.com
>> Subject: [Coco] 6809 compilers
>>
>> In the very early 80s, I used the Micro Works SDS80C
>> editor + assembler + monitor cartridge, to assemble 6809 binaries.
>> I still have this cartridge: http://qdv.pw/coco/?p=213
>> Surely in 2014 must be a better way to compile sources
>> on a powerful windows machine. Any suggestions?
>> Thanks.
>
>> Kandur
>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>