[Coco] newb: Can I use DriveWire with my CoCo 2?

Chad H chadbh74 at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 23 00:03:43 EDT 2013 

Switching it back down to 57600 gives me the following...

Sun Sep 22 2013 23:01:56.703  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
UNKNOWN OPCODE: 25 
Sun Sep 22 2013 23:01:56.718  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
UNKNOWN OPCODE: 33 !
Sun Sep 22 2013 23:01:56.921  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_FASTWRITE_10
Sun Sep 22 2013 23:01:56.921  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
OP_FASTWRITE_10 took 203ms.

Do I need to select the swap bits?

-----Original Message-----
From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On
Behalf Of Ken H.
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:50 PM
To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [Coco] newb: Can I use DriveWire with my CoCo 2?

For the CoCo2 you should set SerialRate=57600.
The server receives the turbo mode command at 57K and automatically
switches to turbo mode -113K/2 stop bits/flip output bits


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Chad H <chadbh74 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Did do that too, it upgraded to the "p" revision.  I did find the right
> .ROM
> to flash my EPROM with but still getting same thing as when I was using
the
> .BIN version..
>
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:00.046  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:00.046  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 218ms.
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:03.312  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:03.312  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 234ms.
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:05.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:05.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 219ms.
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:33.078  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:33.078  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 235ms.
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:35.500  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:35.500  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 219ms.
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:37.578  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> Sun Sep 22 2013 22:31:37.578  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-9
> OP_READEX took 235ms.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com]
> On
> Behalf Of Ken H.
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:13 PM
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [Coco] newb: Can I use DriveWire with my CoCo 2?
>
> Make sure you have the latest version of Drivewire server using
> menu/tools/check for new version.
> There was a recent bug fix for CoCo2 turbo mode
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Chad H <chadbh74 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Set the following...
> > DetectDATurbo=true
> > DW3Only=False
> > HDBDOSMode=true
> > SerialRate=115200
> >
> > Still IO ERROR with the following...
> >
> > Sun Sep 22 2013 20:01:50.406  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> > Sun Sep 22 2013 20:01:50.406  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > OP_READEX took 250ms.
> > Sun Sep 22 2013 20:01:53.781  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_READEX
> > Sun Sep 22 2013 20:01:53.781  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > OP_READEX took 266ms.
> >
> > Changing any of the above settings results in "Invalid Opcode" errors or
> > hangs.. ugh
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com]
> > On
> > Behalf Of Ken H.
> > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 7:30 PM
> > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
> > Subject: Re: [Coco] newb: Can I use DriveWire with my CoCo 2?
> >
> > You need to set DetectDATurbo=true   at the drivewire config menu (turn
> > advanced config on) so that he sever will respond to the HDBDOS request
> to
> > switch to turbo mode.
> > Also make sure that your cable is turbo mode compatible.  Pins 1&2 on
the
> > CoCo side should be connected.
> >
> > On Monday, September 23, 2013, Chad H wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I switched to XP box and got DriveWire 4 running after having to
> > > install
> > > Java (Version 7, latest).  I created a test.dsk file and loaded my
> > > DriveWire
> > > 3 ROM and all was working well.  I then loaded the DriveWire 4 ROM in
> the
> > > Snapshop archive posted by Tormod (Thanks again) and it does boot and
> say
> > > "HDB-DOS 1.4 DW4 COCO 2" and go to OK prompt.  But all Disk ops are
> > failing
> > > with ?IO ERROR, even simple DIR of the test.dsk.  Here's the DriveWire
> 4
> > > server side log of this.  Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:41.359  INFO   DWProtocolHandler   dwUIcliIn-44
> > > requesting protocol device reset
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:47.406  INFO   DWSerialDevice      dwproto-0-10
> > > opened serial device COM1
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:49.156  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 25
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:49.156  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 33 !
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:49.359  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_FASTWRITE_10
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:49.359  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > OP_FASTWRITE_10 took 203ms.
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:51.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 25
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:51.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 33 !
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:52.093  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_FASTWRITE_10
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:52.093  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > OP_FASTWRITE_10 took 203ms.
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:56.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 29
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:56.890  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > UNKNOWN OPCODE: 33 !
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:57.093  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > Timed out reading from CoCo in OP_FASTWRITE_10
> > > Sun Sep 22 2013 18:45:57.093  WARN   DWProtocolHandler   dwproto-0-10
> > > OP_FASTWRITE_10 took 203ms.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com <javascript:;> [mailto:
> > > coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com <javascript:;>] On
> > > Behalf Of Aaron Wolfe
> > > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:44 AM
> > > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
> > > Subject: Re: [Coco] newb: Can I use DriveWire with my CoCo 2?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Chad H
> > <chadbh74 at hotmail.com<javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I concur with this entirely.  I also feel what Aaron said about
> > > > "documentation not being fun".  While I'm not currently employed as
a
> > > > "programmer" per say, I do make use of my skills in this area at my
> > work
> > > > place not only for personal benefit but also for the benefit of
> > > co-workers.
> > > > Many of my projects there are SOLEY for their benefit in fact.  I to
> >  do
> > > not
> > > > care for "waisting time" on documentation.  Some of those
> knuckleheads
> > > > wouldn't even read it anyways, they just come straight to me to
> figure
> > > out
> > > > how to do something with the applications I come up with.  It's just
> > how
> > > > people are wired...they go to whatever resource is the most
> convenient
> > > and
> > > > helpful.   Here in the CoCo online community, people can't just call
> up
> > > or
> > > > talk directly to the authors, they need a good place to go to get
> > > > 'standardized/official' support.  Now if they take it upon
themselves
> > to
> > > > experiment and go outside the box to 3rd party ROM's or other mods,
> > they
> > > > should seek support elsewhere on that.  It's not the responsibility
> of
> > > the
> > > > author to support mahem they didn't create.
> > > >
> > > > On a side note... I think I found that DriveWire 4 package is NOT
> > > supported
> > > > by Windows '98.  If it is, will someone please tell me what I'm
> > missing.
> > > I
> > > > will describe what I've done so far.  Keep in mind DriveWire 3
> already
> > > runs
> > > > fine on this machine.
> > > > *  Unzipped and executed DriveWire 4, got message: "Java 1.5 is
> > required"
> > > > and it closed, so I researched
> > > >         For the lastest win'98 compatibal Java package which does
> seem
> > to
> > > be
> > > > 1.5.
> > > > * Installed Java 1.5 (586) revision 18 and attempted to execute DW4,
> > got
> > > > message: "Could not find the Main class.  Program will exit".
> > > >         I Googled this and found someone had some luck running it
> from
> > > the
> > > > command line after Java was added to the PATH so
> > > >         I tried that and got: Exception in thread "Main"
> > > > Java.Lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError
> > > >
> > > > I suspect DriveWire 4 was compiled to use a higher version of Java,
> > which
> > > > Windows '98 doesn't seem to be able to run a higher version of Java.
> I
> > > > tried installing Java 1.6 and it failed.
> > >
> > > DW4 is supposed to require only Java 1.5, but I may have broken that
> > > somewhere along the way.  At one point I did have it running on a
> > > Win9x virtual machine but that was a good while ago.  I'll see if I
> > > can find out more.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Coco mailing list
> > > Coco at maltedmedia.com <javascript:;>
> > > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Coco mailing list
> > > Coco at maltedmedia.com <javascript:;>
> > > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>

--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

More information about the Coco mailing list