[Coco] too wordy?

[Mark McDougall]

On 10/10/2013 12:27 AM, Ciaran Anscomb wrote:

> The FPGAs so far are all CoCo 3, aren't they?  The behaviour I have in
> mind is an internal function of the SAM (so unless that happened to
> be carried forward, Dragon/CoCo 1/2 only).  Unless you had a handle
> on exactly what it was doing, you're likely to hit the same issue
> reimplementing it in FPGA!

Hmm... I have a Coco 1/2 FPGA implementation... what exactly is the issue? 
And do you have sample code to test against?

Regards,

-- 
|              Mark McDougall                | "Electrical Engineers do it
|  <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug>   |   with less resistance!"