[Coco] Quoting private email

[Juan Castro]

It was me who posted it on the list. I did it without malice, and
without any intention to disparage, only to relay the useful
information that the product in question was meant to an audience
different from us. In my mind, informing that to other people in the
same situation (we're all hobbyists here, aren't we?) would just save
time. If anything, if I paraphrased instead of quoting, I would be in
risk of distorting something.

By the way, I live in Brazil. I don't know how's the law about
received e-mails here. I'll have my lawyer check out.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:49 PM, tonym <tonym at compusource.net> wrote:
>>---- Original Message ----
>>From: "Tormod Volden" <lists.tormod at gmail.com>
>>Sent: 9/26/2013 3:51:13 PM
>>To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Coco] Quoting private email
>>
>>What a lynch mob! I don't see any evidence of the person mentioned in
>>the original post being the same guy who "threatened" Steve. All I can
>>see from Dennis' post is that he /asked/ for the message to be
>>removed. So from there to call him "condescending pr!ck" for his
>>"manifesting such behavior" is bad will in my opinion. Granted, I
>>would also guess it is the same person, but it would be a guess, very
>>much like Dennis's guess about him self-googling - which was also used
>>against the person further down in the thread.
>>
>
> Let's see...
>
> "Obviously <SuperDuperFluxCapacitorWidget> perfectly supports also the TRS-80.
>
> ***The reason because you didn't find TRS-80 on the examples list is because
> <SuperDuperFluxCapacitorWidget> is a professional product with a "professional" price***
>
> ***. We usually
> solve problems and provide all-inclusive assistance on industrial machinery
> that is worth more than 10.000$***
>
> *** Our prices are not compatible with hobby usage.***
>
> *** You should try to use this hobby emulator and hope they will give you some
> kind of support, I personally don't know them ***
>
>
>
> Item name changed to protect the guil.. er, I mean, the innocent...   :)
>
>
>
> Yup... Definitely set off MY pr!ck-O-meter deep into the red...
>
> If you don't see that reply as condescending, then you need to read it again. And again. And again.
>
> Think about it...
> It's OBVIOUS it's shows him in a bad light, else why would he ask it be removed?
>
> Anyway... this is SO off base of the list topic, it's not even worth wasting my time on...
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco