[Coco] coco x

[Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)]

why not to stick with the cocoFPGA and make a slot connector on it ? So we
can use real coco hardware on it ?




On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, camillus Blockx <camillus.b.58 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> My reply to the discussion for coco x got lost I think, but, IMHO
> would it not be easier to concentrate to replace the GIME and the 6809 (
> 6309 ) with FPGA. This could probably be done with a smaller FPGA ( read
> cheaper ) on one board. That would take away the bottlenecks of a faster
> coco. Also would get rid of the obsoleteness of those two parts. Would it
> be no coco? I do not know, an iPhone stay's an iPhone no matter how modern
> and fancy the guts are. The coco was a consept, and a good one. The
> sentimental value is in our mind.
>
> Keep on brainstorming guru's, just keep the prices as low as possible,
> nobody is standing in line for a coco of $300...$500, no matter how hi and
> amazing the specs are. Most of us want to play or work with the "old stuff"
> anyway.
>
> Camillus
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>



-- 
Long live the CoCo