[Coco] About the tylg (type language) ident report

[Robert Gault]

Gene Heskett wrote:

> I believe this is probably less of a problem than it could be, primarily
> because the huge majority of the modules that go to make up the kernel do
> not actually have any 6309 only code in them.  If that module builds on a
> 6809 premise setting, without the above ifne verse, then it likely does not
> actually have 6309 code in it.  Or this assembler (referring to the nitros9
> assembler, not mamou) would be squawking about it.
>

That is not the best way to look at the "problem". There are quite a large 
number of modules/programs that include conditional 6309 code. When these are 
compiled, there is no provision for selecting the language Objct vs Obj6309.

 From a practical point of view, it does not make the least difference how these 
modules are labeled. However, if you run Ident and get the "wrong" answer, you 
might wonder just what you are using.