[Coco] Roger Taylor responds to the ByteCellar warning post
Rob Rosenbrock
bester at adamswells.com
Thu Oct 18 22:02:36 EDT 2012
Please take this off list...
On Oct 18, 2012, at 9:50 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com> wrote:
> When do I get my money back?? It's been two years? Lawsuits? He is the
> guy that should be brought up on charges.
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
>
>
> bp
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yea. This latest pisses me off.
>>
>> Roger Taylor is a straight up thief. A criminal.
>>
>> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/#comment-13764
>>
>>
>>
>> bp
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Stephen H. Fischer
>> <SFischer1 at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> YES for certain.
>>>
>>> See my previous post about Roger.
>>>
>>> SHF
>>>
>>> There are two, many times repeated, posts on Usenet that are just as
>>> vicious, the posters are very sick.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Wolfe" <aawolfe at gmail.com>
>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:46 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Roger Taylor responds to the ByteCellar warning post
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Although I'm sure it won't happen, it really would be best for all
>>>> CoCo enthusiasts if Roger and his mistakes were just put behind us.
>>>>
>>>> There is a great deal of new, forward movement and cooperation between
>>>> current members of the community working on some great projects.
>>>>
>>>> There is no need to bring this mess into the light again. Let it die.
>>>>
>>>> $0.02
>>>>
>>>> -Aaron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Last comment (a few specific other-commenter comment responses higher
>>>>> up in the list also).
>>>>>
>>>>> "...
>>>>> Blake and Cloud-9 alone may have killed the business that Roger Taylor
>>>>> worked hard to build with a customer base of over 800 CoCo users
>>>>> around the world."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/
>>>>>
>>>>> I came into the scene not knowing which or where, ordered what seemed
>>>>> an appealing product, got burned - twice - and gave a cautionary
>>>>> synopsis to the retro fans that read my blog. I Wasn't looking for an
>>>>> opportunity to destroy someone's business. I think if there had been
>>>>> better representation up front, things would be different. True, I
>>>>> would not have ordered the device (twice), but I also would not have
>>>>> gotten burned and been in a position to share the experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if I should feel guilty, somehow.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Heisenberg may have slept here.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Heisenberg may have slept here.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Heisenberg may have slept here.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list