[Coco] Roger Taylor responds to the ByteCellar warning post

Rob Rosenbrock bester at adamswells.com
Thu Oct 18 22:02:36 EDT 2012


Please take this off list...

On Oct 18, 2012, at 9:50 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com> wrote:

> When do I get my money back?? It's been two years? Lawsuits? He is the
> guy that should be brought up on charges.
> 
> Or am I missing something?
> 
> 
> 
> bp
> 
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yea. This latest pisses me off.
>> 
>> Roger Taylor is a straight up thief. A criminal.
>> 
>> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/#comment-13764
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> bp
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Stephen H. Fischer
>> <SFischer1 at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> YES for certain.
>>> 
>>> See my previous post about Roger.
>>> 
>>> SHF
>>> 
>>> There are two, many times repeated, posts on Usenet that are just as
>>> vicious, the posters are very sick.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Wolfe" <aawolfe at gmail.com>
>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:46 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Roger Taylor responds to the ByteCellar warning post
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Although I'm sure it won't happen, it really would be best for all
>>>> CoCo enthusiasts if Roger and his mistakes were just put behind us.
>>>> 
>>>> There is a great deal of new, forward movement and cooperation between
>>>> current members of the community working on some great projects.
>>>> 
>>>> There is no need to bring this mess into the light again.  Let it die.
>>>> 
>>>> $0.02
>>>> 
>>>> -Aaron
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Last comment (a few specific other-commenter comment responses higher
>>>>> up in the list also).
>>>>> 
>>>>> "...
>>>>> Blake and Cloud-9 alone may have killed the business that Roger Taylor
>>>>> worked hard to build with a customer base of over 800 CoCo users
>>>>> around the world."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I came into the scene not knowing which or where, ordered what seemed
>>>>> an appealing product, got burned - twice - and gave a cautionary
>>>>> synopsis to the retro fans that read my blog. I Wasn't looking for an
>>>>> opportunity to destroy someone's business. I think if there had been
>>>>> better representation up front, things would be different. True, I
>>>>> would not have ordered the device (twice), but I also would not have
>>>>> gotten burned and been in a position to share the experience.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not sure if I should feel guilty, somehow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> bp
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Heisenberg may have slept here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> --
>> Heisenberg may have slept here.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Heisenberg may have slept here.
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco



More information about the Coco mailing list