[Coco] Roger Taylor responds to the ByteCellar warning post

[Aaron Wolfe]

Although I'm sure it won't happen, it really would be best for all
CoCo enthusiasts if Roger and his mistakes were just put behind us.

There is a great deal of new, forward movement and cooperation between
current members of the community working on some great projects.

There is no need to bring this mess into the light again.  Let it die.

$0.02

-Aaron



On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Blake Patterson <blakespot at gmail.com> wrote:
> Last comment (a few specific other-commenter comment responses higher
> up in the list also).
>
> "...
> Blake and Cloud-9 alone may have killed the business that Roger Taylor
> worked hard to build with a customer base of over 800 CoCo users
> around the world."
>
> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/
>
> I came into the scene not knowing which or where, ordered what seemed
> an appealing product, got burned - twice - and gave a cautionary
> synopsis to the retro fans that read my blog. I Wasn't looking for an
> opportunity to destroy someone's business. I think if there had been
> better representation up front, things would be different. True, I
> would not have ordered the device (twice), but I also would not have
> gotten burned and been in a position to share the experience.
>
> Not sure if I should feel guilty, somehow.
>
>
>
>
> bp
>
>
> --
> Heisenberg may have slept here.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco