[Coco] OS-9 Level 1

[Wayne Campbell]

I have been having discussions about this in the coco_chat IRC channel. The 
OS-9 L1 version of Basic09 has a version # of 1.00.00, whereas the version 
for Level 2 has a version # of 1.00.01. Deek believes this indicates some 
kind of bug fix that may have caused 1.00.00 to crash under L2. I am not 
sure. All I know for certain is that L1 Basic09 was sold separately, and L2 
Basic09 was included with the OS. In NOS-9, the level 1 and level 2 6809 
versions are identical, and the 6309 version has been modified.

Wayne

-- 
Basic09 is the language of the future ;)

Need to recover Basic09 I-Code source?
Download http://cococoding.com/wayne/decode.os9

asa.rand at gmail.com

-- 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Pierce" <ooogalapasooo at aol.com>
To: <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Coco] OS-9 Level 1


>
> I found the disk images for the OS9 lv1 v1.0 and OS9 lv1 v2.0.
> My question is this...
> Did OS9 Lv1 v 1.0 have a 3rd disk with modules? The .dsks I found, there 
> is only the RSDOS "boot" disk and a system disk.
>
> The OS9 Lv1 v2.0 has a Boot disk and a Modules disk as I remember it did.
>
> The only Basic09 I could find for Lv1 are the ones that were archived for 
> Nitros9.
> My question here is...
> Were they modified in any way? Bug fixed? The notes were by Boisy.. any 
> idea what was done Boisy? If not, it would be no problem to "assemble" a 
> dsk of the original files that came out for Lv1.
>
> There are plenty of copies of the other programmig packages for Os9 Lv1... 
> C, Pascal, Forth, and I think even Lisp.
>
>
>
> Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
> Bill Pierce
> ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco