[Coco] Smalles CoCo ever "re-created"??
Mark McDougall
msmcdoug at iinet.net.au
Thu Dec 20 16:52:07 EST 2012
On 21/12/2012 2:10 AM, Bill Loguidice wrote:
> That was back in 2005 and was known both as the Commodore 64 30-in-1 and
> the C-64 DTV, and was used in a few other inexpensive TV games products.
(snip)
Nice summary Bill!
Indeed I have the C64-DTV and 'hacked' it to add keyboard and 1541 (disk
drive) - mounting it in a plastic zippy box. There's a well documented fix
for the colours (a few resistors IIRC) that I'm yet to apply.
> A similar feat was accomplished in the Atari Flashback 2
> with the original Atari 2600 architecture (the other Flashback models were
> emulations/simulations), led by Curt Vendel.
I bought the original flashback (for AUD$20) before I learned that it was
actually a NOAC (NES-On-A-Chip) with ported games. As a result, I have never
even taken it out of the box.
It might be worth noting that both the C64 and A2600 have freely-available
FPGA designs; they just need some hardware to run on. Atm they target either
generic FPGA development kits or, in the the case of the C64, the
purpose-built C-One and Turbo Chameleon 64 kits. Interested parties may want
to check out the Chameleon; that would be capable of running the Coco and
it's quite small!
> I think the reality of both the engineering demands/costs and the
> capabilities of today's low cost platforms (be they FPGA implementations or
> something like a Rasberry Pi), a modern day platform would almost certainly
> be a software emulation layer on some generic hardware, meaning original
> peripherals simply wouldn't work.
Agreed. The Coco simply doesn't have the market share that the C64 enjoyed,
so we'll never see a mass-produced Coco-On-A-Joystick. Any such device would
have to come from an enthusiast, and it will be expensive simply due to
economies of scale.
Regards,
--
| Mark McDougall | "Electrical Engineers do it
| <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug> | with less resistance!"
More information about the Coco
mailing list