[Coco] old backups, RESTORED!
Steven Hirsch
snhirsch at gmail.com
Fri Jan 7 07:20:29 EST 2011
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Willard Goosey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:45:39PM -0500, Steven Hirsch wrote:
>> No, I'm all set. I've been using an LTO-2 tape system for a while. One
>> tape holds about 300GB, so it's a one-step operation for the Linux server
>> and a second run to do my main workstation. The hobby machines Apple 2,
>> CoCo, etc.) access all the working data from my main fileserver so the
>> backup goes along with everything else.
>
> Sweet. I could never get my hands on a reliable tape drive.
Keep an eye on eBay. LTO-2 drives were averaging $65-80 about a year ago
and have probably dropped since then. You can probably get a quantity of
tapes the same way, but make SURE the seller has not tried to bulk-erase
them! LTO media are preformatted with a servo track and bulk erase will
ruin them. Catches a lot of folks by surprise, because the DLT tapes they
resemble can be blanked.
LTO media keep a condition and pass counter in a reserved section, so you
can use the drive's diagnostic software to evaluate their condition. Tape
life is extremely long if not physically mistreated, so I wouldn't be too
scared about used ones.
For that matter, if your storage needs are more modest you can probably
pickup a DLT IV drive for a fraction of that price (70 GB compressed
capacity).
Both of these devices are serious approaches to data archiving and are
vastly more reliable than rotary-head data storage (DAT and 8mm). In my
opinion, reliance on a rotary-head drive is a poor bet. I've had nothing
but problems with them - 8mm in particular.
>> Amiga is a bit more problematic. From time to time, image the drive in my
>> A2000 by physically connecting it to the Linux box, but that's a bit
>> cumbersome (Linux understands FFS).
>
> xsurf is the tool.
I'll check it out. Thanks!
Steve
--
More information about the Coco
mailing list