[Coco] 6502 to 6809 translation
gene heskett
gheskett at wdtv.com
Mon Aug 1 23:26:11 EDT 2011
On Monday, August 01, 2011 11:21:57 PM Stephen H. Fischer did opine:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "gene heskett" <gheskett at wdtv.com>
> To: <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 7:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Coco] 6502 to 6809 translation
>
> > On Monday, August 01, 2011 10:17:45 PM Stephen H. Fischer did opine:
> ...
>
> >> I do not know if my original disks from Edgar M. (Bud) Pass, Ph.D.
> >> are readable.
> >
> > I may have some originals, and I do mean original, level 1.00.00 defs
> > and all, disks around someplace. I used that as a framework, Bud's
> > code is very well composed, and anyone who took his classes was being
> > taught by the
> > best.
>
> Those disks are so old that you had better do a full format before
> looking at them!
>
> If you can find the disks, I will put then next to the DOC's given
> before.
>
> > My site has a Sleuth that I updated to level 2 defs, and I believe I
> > later fixed it for 6309 codes too. But I didn't touch the 6502 stuff
> > it can also do. I always considered the original 6502 as on a KIM-1,
> > as being one of the two early cpu's, the z-80 was the other, that
> > were at best dane bramaged.
>
> Actually AFAIK the 6502 was the next CPU designed by the folks that did
> the 6800.
>
> I put your sleuth next to it's DOC's given before. Thanks!
>
Those docs are going to be a bit 'dated' I think. Unless someone else also
worked on sleuth too. I got perms from Bud to do that, FWIW. But back in
those days it was a big buck ($99) program, so I never spread it around
until the last couple of years.
> If you liked sleuth so much, if it were not for your intense MS/INTEL
> dislike, I have a dissembler for x86 that blows any other dissembler
> that you would have liked.
>
> It actually is an emulator that simulates executing the instructions
> thus determining on it's own what is data and what is code. Very
> good!!! And the only way to do an dissembler right.
>
> But I purchased the version that does not do 32 bit binaries, I was not
> aware that it did not do them. I got busy and never purchased the better
> version. By that time programs had gotten so complex that only the
> hackers used that dissembler before generating even better dissemblers.
> (Ever wonder how the groups competed with each other delivering cracks
> so fast?).
>
> SHF
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
Cheers, gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
How can you do 'New Math' problems with an 'Old Math' mind?
-- Charles Schulz
More information about the Coco
mailing list