[Coco] Why do a next Gen CoCo?
msmcdoug at iinet.net.au
Fri Nov 19 01:15:48 EST 2010
On 19/11/2010 1:06 PM, Steve Bjork wrote:
> Remember, the CoCo4 Project did include an CoCo1/2/3 emulator that would
> work most Color Computer without any mods.
> But the emulator did not stop there. You could also could also use the
> optional I/O card to hookup CoCo Joysticks, Floppy Disk controller card and
> other devices to the CoCo 4 system. The I/O card would have its own
> Micro-CPU chip to talk to the CoCo hardware and USB interface to the PC.
> Best of all, it was deign to fit inside a CoCo case and use the CoCo
> keyboard. It would look and work just like a CoCo 3.
I am guilty of not taking the time to go back and re-familiarise myself with
your project - sorry! :(
What I'd be interested to know is whether or not your 'specification' is
something that could feasibly be implemented in an FPGA. It'd be great to
have that option as I discussed in another post (rhetorical question, I
don't expect you to answer that here!)
> For the CoCo, the device would be about the size of a rom pak and interface
> into a PC as a USB device. Its operation would be like DriveWire without the
> need to mod DECB or OS-9. An OS-9 driver could be written to talk to the
> device in a "native" mode for faster byte transfers. (And be upto 8 times
> faster than drive wire too.)
> The plan is to create a working device to the CoCo first and then release
> the design to public domain for others to use with their non-coco systems.
I can understand the utility of emulating the WD controller for connecting
to the Coco. Whilst I applaud the efforts of Drivewire (and I don't mean to
detract from it at all) it has always bugged me that you need to patch DECB,
which means it isn't 100% compatible with all software. And the tight code
loops also mean you're restricted to what CPU speeds you can run it on.
I'm also assuming you have some type of modern, high-capacity storage device
connected to the other side that stores many floppy disk images?!?
Where you lose me is connecting this to a PC via USB. I don't see the need
for it in this case, as the WD controller can be emulated within the PC more
efficiently. You also have the option then of accessing floppy images on the
host file system, as well as external media such as SD, USB.
Have I missed something in your explanation?
| Mark McDougall | "Electrical Engineers do it
| <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug> | with less resistance!"
More information about the Coco