[Coco] Microware OS-9 for x86
mjkerpan at kerpan.com
Wed Jun 16 14:44:40 EDT 2010
I think that ARM would be LESS safe, given that OS-9 is market as an
embedded OS and ARM is just about the most popular architecture for
embedded purposes. Nitros-9 for x86 would probably be seen as a
harmless nostalgia trip by the folks at Radsys, whereas a Nitros-9 for
ARM would set off alarm bells in an instant.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett at gmail.com> wrote:
> One could probably liquidate the lot of us & not be able to make a payment.
> So this would be a project for the DE1, but looking over the fence to x86
> code just doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Arm or PPC makes far more
> sense, and is no doubt a lot safer. But the arm boards start at about $229.
More information about the Coco