[Coco] break command in OS9/NitrOS9

[Bob Devries]

Hi Gene,

Firstly, the KILL command appears to be built into the shell. (Page 3-12 of 
the OS9 command reference applies)

It has no options except the process number.

Boisy Pitre's "send" command uses the F$Send OS9 system call, and it can 
send anything to a running process (well, 0 to 255 anyhow).

Regards, Bob Devries

--
Besides a mathematical inclination, an exceptionally good mastery of one's 
native tongue is the most vital asset of a competent programmer.

Edsger W.Dijkstra, 18 June 1975

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett at verizon.net>
To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Coco] break command in OS9/NitrOS9



> On Friday 15 January 2010, Bob Devries wrote:

>>Gene, you said:

>>> There is "kill process number".  Do a procs to see which one you want to

>>> kill, and use its number.  I don't think this is a chr$(3) though, so it

>>> might not be what you want.

>>

>>The standard OS9 "kill" command sends a kill signal to the process. I want

>>to send a break.

>

> I don't believe it sends it to the process, but to the os itself using the

> SS.Kill call.  On receipt of that, os9 kills the errant process and cleans 

> up

> the resources it used so they are free for the next process that asks for

> them.  The process itself never knows what hit it.  When the OS comes back

> from an interrupt, it simply is no longer in the queue.  Rather

> unceremonious, but very effective.  Linux, if a process is hung in a sleep

> state, called a zombie, may have to actually do a reboot to clean up the

> debris.

>

>>I'll explain why.

>>

>>At the moment I've been helping Wayne trying to set up a Basic09 programme

>>to create multiple windows on the same screen. Occasionally, I do 

>>something

>>wrong, and I lose the ability to "CLEAR" to the Basic09 screen, and all I

>>can do is kill the Basic09 Process, which gives me back the ability to

>>"CLEAR" to the Basic09 screen, but unfortunately, Basic09 has stopped, and

>>I'm at the command line on that screen. If I could just send a BREAK, then

>> I would hope that Basic09 would just quit the programme that is running

>> and return to it's own command prompt. That's the theory, anyhow.

>>

>>Regards, Bob Devries

>

> I can see the advantages of that of course.  Is there an entry in the 

> manuals

> that there is a way to have it send a different character?  I'll have to

> plead that I haven't looked to see if there any extra options to it.  And 

> I

> just checked the echo docs, and its purely text.

>

> -- 

> Cheers, Gene

> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:

> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."

> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)

>

> Everything I like is either illegal, immoral or fattening.

> -- Alexander Woollcott

>

> --

> Coco mailing list

> Coco at maltedmedia.com

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco