[Coco] Windows 95 help

[jdaggett at gate.net]

Windows 95 OSR2.1 OEM does not require a qualifying disk. I could dig 
around and see if I still have that CD.  Besides if you are going to run 95 
this is the version to have. 

james

On 28 Mar 2009 at 6:36, Bob Devries wrote:

> Windows 3.1 should be a qualifying product, however.....
> 
> As I remember, the Win95 install writes to the qualifying disc so that
> it can only be done once. I do not remember just what is written,
> though. Disk images for an unadulterated copy of windows 3.1 install
> disks may be available on the net.
> 
> --
> Regards, Bob Devries, Dalby, Queensland, Australia
> 
> Isaiah 50:4 The sovereign Lord has given me
> the capacity to be his spokesman,
> so that I know how to help the weary.
> 
> website: http://www.home.gil.com.au/~bdevasl
> my blog: http://bdevries.invigorated.org/
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "N8WQ" <exwn8jef at gmail.com>
> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 6:10 AM Subject: [Coco] Windows 95 help
> 
> 
> > hey guys,
> > I need help with Win95. I recently threw out a lot of my old CD's
> > like PowerPoint 95, Excel 95, ect. :(  I am trying to install Win95
> > upgrade on my old computer I am using for a CoCo 3 emulator. My
> > install quits because my computer can't find a qualifying product. I
> > have original CD for Win 95 and original floppies to Win 3.1. Does
> > anyone remember what the qualifying products were for Win95?
> > Thanks...
> >
> > Alan Jones
> >
> > -- 
> > N8WQ - Canal Winchester, Ohio
> > http://exwn8jef.googlepages.com/home
> >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco 
> 
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco