[Coco] Drivewire question

[Willard Goosey]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Boisy Pitre wrote:

> There is a slight impact, but there's an interesting trade off. The  
> faster the data transmits, the less time interrupts stay masked, so at  
> 115,200bps, the typeahead buffer is very responsive.  

Humm, that makes sense.  I hadn't thought of it that way.  

I'm just used to the "bit-banger hogs CPU" idea, I guess.

Willard
-- 
Willard Goosey  goosey at sdc.org
Socorro, New Mexico, USA
I search my heart and find Cimmeria, land of Darkness and the Night.
  -- R.E. Howard