[Coco] Windows 95 help
exwn8jef at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 01:22:50 EDT 2009
What does "OSR2.1" mean? If my memory serves me correctly, I bought my
copy of Win 95 about one year after it first came out. It is a blast
from the past running Win 95 again!
N8WQ - Canal Winchester, Ohio
jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
> Windows 95 OSR2.1 OEM does not require a qualifying disk. I could dig
> around and see if I still have that CD. Besides if you are going to run 95
> this is the version to have.
> On 28 Mar 2009 at 6:36, Bob Devries wrote:
>> Windows 3.1 should be a qualifying product, however.....
>> As I remember, the Win95 install writes to the qualifying disc so that
>> it can only be done once. I do not remember just what is written,
>> though. Disk images for an unadulterated copy of windows 3.1 install
>> disks may be available on the net.
>> Regards, Bob Devries, Dalby, Queensland, Australia
>> Isaiah 50:4 The sovereign Lord has given me
>> the capacity to be his spokesman,
>> so that I know how to help the weary.
>> website: http://www.home.gil.com.au/~bdevasl
>> my blog: http://bdevries.invigorated.org/
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "N8WQ" <exwn8jef at gmail.com>
>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 6:10 AM Subject: [Coco] Windows 95 help
>>> hey guys,
>>> I need help with Win95. I recently threw out a lot of my old CD's
>>> like PowerPoint 95, Excel 95, ect. :( I am trying to install Win95
>>> upgrade on my old computer I am using for a CoCo 3 emulator. My
>>> install quits because my computer can't find a qualifying product. I
>>> have original CD for Win 95 and original floppies to Win 3.1. Does
>>> anyone remember what the qualifying products were for Win95?
>>> Alan Jones
>>> N8WQ - Canal Winchester, Ohio
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
More information about the Coco