[Coco] CoCo 1 64K upgrade failed :(.
Ryan Pritchard
coconut at pritchard.ca
Fri Sep 26 17:12:57 EDT 2008
On further reviewing the Datasheets say 128 refresh cycles/2ms, so because
it says so, I am not going to bother to understand the logic.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Pritchard <coconut at pritchard.ca>wrote:
> I don't understand why the SAM is only refreshing at 128 cycles. You have
> 8 address bits getting latched on RAS and then the next 8 bit being latched
> on CAS. Wouldn't 8 address bits mean 256 cycles? Or is the refresh
> occuring for 2 rows per cycle?
>
>
--
Regards,
Ryan Pritchard
Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
More information about the Coco
mailing list