[Coco] cocomag project: Questions for the users

[Joel Ewy]

tim lindner wrote:
> [Quick: I am running the cocomag project. It assembles volunteers (like
> yourself), to help bring Color Computer Magazines to the web. See the
> project here: <http://cocomag.dyndns.org/UnderColor.shtml>]
>
> I have a questions for the users:
>
> Currently the system is set up to require the second check to have no
> changes from the first before accepting the task as complete.
>
> If there was a change on the second check, an additional check will be
> required.
>
> I feel this is slowing down the project, but it tends to improve the
> results.
>
> What do you think is the proper way to handle this?
>
>   
I'd say that's generally what we want, but maybe it can be made more
explicit whether one is looking at a second check or the first check.  I
might fiddle around with spaces and whatnot just to make it look better,
but I might be less inclined to mess around with trivial things if I
knew it was the final check, and just let it go through if there weren't
any real errors.  I dunno.

JCE