[Coco] HD floppy controller update: success!

Joel Ewy jcewy at swbell.net
Sat Jul 5 16:47:04 EDT 2008


Chuck Youse wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 11:35 -0500, Joel Ewy wrote:

>

>> Hey Chuck, this is good stuff you're working on.

>>

>> IMHO, I think a High Density CoCo OS-9 disk should be formatted the same

>> as an MM/1 HD floppy. The MM/1 uses the WD37C65, and 33 256-byte

>> sectors per track. I don't have any info immediately at hand about gap

>> length. In the MM/1 technical manual the "rates" parameter to dmode is

>> $10. Perhaps this is passed directly to the FDC, and the 37C65

>> datasheet might give more specific info.

>>

>

> Hmm, that's a rather odd format. Is that a 5.25" HD floppy or 3.5"?

>

>

This is 3.5"

> The only problem I have with this is the fact that Linux freaks out when

> you have a combination of 256-byte sectors and an odd number of sectors

> per track. And really that only concerns me because one of the main

> advantages to having this controller is that it makes transport of files

> between systems much simpler.

>

And that's a good reason.

> But really, it's not set in stone; it's all driver-driven at that point.

> Even differing device descriptors under OS-9 should give you the

> MM/1<->Coco enjoyment you want.

>

> C.

>

>

True enough. Dmode to the rescue. I remember having several sets of
device descriptors hanging around on the CoCo, and even an extra driver
that ran the Disto SCII in halt-mode so I could read in 512-byte sectors
for the 'rsdos' utility. I had a 'di' descriptor for reading IBM
formatted disks (as they still would have been called in those days.).
So I could 'rsdos -get -raw /di /h0 filename' or whatever.

JCE


>

> --

> Coco mailing list

> Coco at maltedmedia.com

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

>

>





More information about the Coco mailing list