[Coco] Done
Mark Marlette
mark at cloud9tech.com
Sat Aug 16 05:56:21 EDT 2008
Kevin,
This will be my only response to this. Not mad either.
I have followed through on my projects all though
it has taken way longer than I or anyone else would say to complete.
Some look for reasons to not complete, I spend my time doing.
I am not quitting, I will finish the SuperBoard project.
Regards,
Mark
At 8/16/2008 02:13 AM, you wrote:
>Michael Harwood wrote:
>>When I made my agreement with Lonnie it was expressly stated that it was
>>non-transferable. This is to say that anyone who wished to have the same
>>sort of deal if I decided to quit would have to negotiate it separately.
>>The only reason I have not relinquished my agreement with Lonnie¹s heirs was
>>due to a fear that they would not re-negotiate a deal and that we would have
>>at least a month to legally sell the DVD¹s in the case of a ³cease and
>>desist² type action. After the recent firestorm I have decided that I will
>>no longer participate in this process at all. I plan to send my
>>cancellation to the estate with a registered letter and wash my hands of
>>this entire process. This will be the last missive you will have to bear
>>from me on this list I will be removing myself this evening and will no
>>longer answer any queries in regards to this project.
>>Regards,
>>Michael Harwood
>>--
>>Coco mailing list
>>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>Oh no you don't!
>
>The following is conjecture on my part. And thus may be false. But ...
>
>YOU allowed this contract to be negotiated with
>only YOU as the point man. I can not conceive of
>it not being possible to have two or even three
>people in the drivers seat. What with life
>having a pesky habit of getting in the way it
>would have been a prudent thing to do. So I
>suspect (could be wrong here) YOU wanted the
>glory. And it was also YOU who got everyone
>fired up by actually getting this thing started.
>Now YOU (wounds and all) need to get it
>finished. Didn't I read a while back that the
>light at the end of the tunnel is visible?
>
>And I happen to agree with you. The last thing
>that should happen is that Rainbow or any other
>vintage magazine should have its digitized
>contents posted online. That just flaunts the ... questionable activity.
>The COORDINATED scanning of color computer
>magazine and Hot CoCo should continue (or
>start). But then just be distributed via DVDs. Quietly.
>
>Someone made a good point about NitrOS9. ...
>
>Boisy? Wow!?! Now I have the utmost respect and
>admiration for Mark and Cloud 9. But Superboard
>ain't gonna break any time to market records.
>(Yes I believe it WILL show up and it will be a
>high quality product!!!) How bout a mild retraction here?
>
>kevin
>
>Pleas don't respond with anger, Mark. No one is
>doing what you are to keep this neat little machine alive!
>
>--
>Coco mailing list
>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version:
>8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1613 - Release Date: 8/15/2008 5:58 AM
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list