[Coco] ncurses Library for C
Manny
cocolist at invigorated.org
Sat Nov 10 14:42:46 EST 2007
Willard Goosey wrote:
>> Having my interest spurred by the discussion of a public domain text
>> editor, I was wondering if an updated ncurses (or curses) package could
>> be created for things like unbuffered input, moving the cursor to a
>> particular position, and the like.
>
> It could be done....
>
> I think the main reason it hasn't is that curses, under OS-9, would
> mainly be a compatiblity library. CGFX has just about everything
> curses offers.
I'll take a look at CGFX to see what it has to offer. I don't really
plan on using a graphics window. I hope to only have to use a text
window that allows the user 40 or 80 columns. Does CGFX have the ability
to detect the size of the window? I'll probably take a look sometime
soon. Probably next week at the earliest. (Three 2am - 12pm shifts have
an amazing ability to stop one's brain from doing much else than sulk
and want sleep. :) )
> That said, there does seem to be a little interest in having proper
> curses for OS-9. There's some source on rtsi that nobody's been able
> to successfully compile...
I've downloaded this and aim to play with it sometime in the future. Or
at least after a few other things get done in my ever expanding todo list.
> Actually, just recently I was complaining to a friend of mine about
> this, and he hacked up a curses front-end he'd written into something
> that pretends to be real curses (he even got rogue to compile with it)
> but the code's so dreadful I doubt the CoCo's C compiler could handle
> it, at least right now.
I find Microware's C compiler to like dreadful code, so that's okay. :)
(Yeah, I know it's loosely based on K&R 1.)
-M.
> For your text editor project, the main reason you might want curses is
> so you could then compile your editor under another OS. If you don't
> care about compatibility, you could just use cgfx.
>
> Willard
More information about the Coco
mailing list