[Coco] Checking/Testing a 68B09P

Frank Pittel fwp at deepthought.com
Mon Jul 2 12:06:34 EDT 2007


On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:39:38AM -0700, Mike Pepe wrote:

> jdaggett at gate.net wrote:

> >On 1 Jul 2007 at 20:38, Mike Pepe wrote:

> >

> >>jdaggett at gate.net wrote:

> >>

> >>>Pins 33 through 39 are different between the MC/HD68B09 and the

> >>>MC/HD68B09E. The differences are significant that would require

> >>>major rewireing of the COco motherboards to use a MC/HD68B09.

> >>Er... what?

> >>

> >>No amount of rewiring will get a 68x09 to run in a CoCo. Rigging up

> >>some sort of contraption to get the clocks synchronized may be

> >>possible, but I wouldn't recommend it!

> >>

> >******************

> >

> >I beg to differ. I would agree that there is no real easy solution but

> >there are some. One can be to feed the E clock to a PLL that multiplies

> >the clock four times and feed that to the MC68B09 EXTAL pin. Then you can

> >slave the MPU off any Coco. The pins on the MC6809E like LIC, BUSY, and

> >AVMA are not used on the Coco 3 and are floating. You leave the MRDY and

> >DMA lines tied high and float the E and Q lines on the MC68B09 and plug

> >the adaptor into a Coco.

> >

> >You can also tap off the 14.3 or 28.6 MHz crystal buffer it and divide

> >down if needed but then if you switch speeds then you have an issue. The

> >best method is to do as above and it will work.

> >

> >james

> >

>

> Well, it's not your method I found confusing, just your semantics.

>

> "Rewire" implies taking existing signals and feeding them to different

> places and it magically works, which as you know is in this case,

> impossible.

>

> Building a PLL and circuit to synchronize the E/Q clock from the SAM to

> a non-E 6809 is indeed possible- but that to me is a bit more than a

> simple rewire job!


Other then doing it because you can. Is there a reason why a person
would want to build an interface to allow the use of a MC68B09 in a
Coco? The cost of building such an interface must certainly exceed the
cost of an "off the shelf" chip that could be used without any
modification.

This is a serious question.

Frank



More information about the Coco mailing list