[Coco] The Definitive Post on the CC-Five ;)

[jdaggett at gate.net]

Then GI did not change the instructin set but only uniquely ID the part with their 
software in the ROM. 

james

On 29 Jan 2007 at 9:51, Mark McDougall wrote:


> jdaggett at gate.net wrote:

> 

> > So it may not be all that beneficial to extract teh code within the

> > processor because of the potential of teh instruction set being

> > non-standard TI instructionset. It is an 8 bit processor that has

> > 0/2K/4K internal ROM (TMS7000,  TMS7020, TMS7040).

> > 

> > In my opinion not worth trying to grab the code and decipher what

> > makes it up. Better to start new with a HC11/HC12 or an AVR. 

> 

> So I'm guessing you haven't seen this? ...

> <http://tlindner.macmess.org/?page_id=96>

> 

> Tim includes a fully commented disassembly of the PIC7040 ROM... (I'm

> yet to look at it myself I must admit)

> 

> Regards,

> 

> -- 

> |              Mark McDougall                | "Electrical Engineers

> do it |  <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug>   |   with less

> resistance!"

> 

> -- 

> Coco mailing list

> Coco at maltedmedia.com

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

> 

> 

> -- 

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/655 - Release Date:

> 1/28/2007 1:12 PM

>