[Coco] Cubix and Coco3 - code snippet

jdaggett at gate.net jdaggett at gate.net
Wed Feb 7 09:09:09 EST 2007


Robert

About a year ago I looked indepth at the Cubix software and did not really find
any assembly issues other than the "ssr" assembler directive wihich is a direct
jump into the OS kernal. That would be the most tidious to alter with a macro.

The real issue is not getting the code into a form that any Coco assembler or
crossassembler can handle. The eral issues are writing peripheral drivers and
such around the main OS core that would work with the COCO1/2/3.

james

On 7 Feb 2007 at 9:01, Robert Gault wrote:


> Gary Zwan wrote:

> > Forgive me gents (and ladies?),

> >

> > Don't really know how to respond to the archive list so it stays in

> > the thread.

> >

> > Here is a portion of the 'command.os' file from cubix:

> >

> > it lost some of the formatting between Winderz notepad

> > and Xandros Kate(?).

> >

> >

> ><snip>

> > Gary

> >

> >

>

> The only item in that piece of code that is not identical to EDTASM

> syntax is FCCZ.

>

> All you need to do is change all FCCZ to FCC and then add a

> terminating FCB. For example.

>

> FCCZ 'Formatting '

> is the same as

> FCC 'Formatting '

> FCB 0

>

> Now I may have guessed wrong on this as there is also a FCS pseudo-op

> which adds $80 to the last character in an FCC string. But if this is

> the only difference between Cubix source code syntax and EDTASM

> syntax, this is a tempest in a teapot.

>

> --

> Coco mailing list

> Coco at maltedmedia.com

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

>

>

> --

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date:

> 2/6/2007 5:52 PM

>






More information about the Coco mailing list