[Coco] glork!!!

[Gene Heskett]

On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Willard Goosey wrote:

>>Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:28:29 -0500

>>From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett at verizon.net>

>>

>>Which, using the above syntax, would appear to be correct.  And I think you

>>would get the same result if a puts("foo bar\n"); was done but its been so

>>long I won't go anywhere near a bible and say that. :)

>

>Goodness, I didn't even think of puts!  Let's see... AT&T man page

>says puts returns EOF on error, doesn't say what it returns on

>success.  Linux man page says non-negative number on sucess, EOF on

>error.  Microware C manual doesn't say anything about puts()'s return

>values.  I'm too sleepy to fire up OS-9 right now, I'd probably fry

>something (damn touchy MPI!), so I can't actually try it.

>

>>I don't think it was the return values, but what it was actually

>>printing, so his strings were being interpreted as numbers somehow,

>>or at least that is how I read it.

>

>Sorry to confuse you?  I was annoyed and sleepy when I posted last

>night.

>

>Willard


NP Willard.  I was probably 2/3rds asleep when I read it. :)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
		-- Vroomfondel