[Coco] Above 512k upgrades
jdaggett at gate.net
jdaggett at gate.net
Tue Aug 14 08:24:16 EDT 2007
Mark
True. Still using the extra two bits above the six in the MMU is still doing a
paging of 512K if you use 256Kx1 DRAMS. In theory there is a way to
demultiplex the Z buss to use Static Rams and the refresh issue goes away.
james
On 14 Aug 2007 at 6:55, Mark Marlette wrote:
>
> james,
>
> As extra register are available they are not needed unless you go
> beyond 2MB limit. The MMU and it's task registers are 6 bits wide and
> all you have to do is tack on the 2 bits to each and then update your
> refresh cycle.
>
> The CoCo can't refresh newer style memories with out a modification.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> At 8/13/2007 07:37 PM, you wrote:
>
> >On 13 Aug 2007 at 17:38, Gary Coulbourne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Chester A Patterson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know where one could purchase (paypal/plastic) a 1MB
> > > > or more RAM upgrade kit for Coco3?
> > >
> > > How do these actually work? I understand the MMU for the standard
> > > 512k, but I must admit to being somewhat baffled with the larger
> > > ones. Do they provide an additional page table for mapping, or
> > > something of the kind? Thanks!
> > >
> > > Peace,
> > > Gary
> > >
> >************************
> >
> >While the standard MMU will only access 512K RAM, there are methods
> >to extend this. All are essentially paging 512K blocks of memory. The
> >GIME chip has an unallocated registers at $FF96, $FF98, and $FF9B.
> >One can use on of these bytes to act as a page register to select up
> >to 256 banks of 512K of RAM.
> >
> >The external board would have to do some address decode for what ever
> >you wish. I believe the common used address is $FF9B.
> >
> >james
> >
> >
> >--
> >Coco mailing list
> >Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.13/946 - Release Date:
> >8/10/2007 3:50 PM
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list