[Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?
robert.gault at worldnet.att.net
Sat Apr 21 19:29:21 EDT 2007
coco at yourdvd.net wrote:
> Marks test of ?peek(&hff90) returns 255 on all of my 3024 multi-paks,
> however it returned 126 on my 3124. I opened the 3124 and there is no
> satellite board nor any piggy backed chips nor any mod of any kind - i
> can't see that this pak has been upgraded. Does this test only work for
> the 3024's? thanks - Rob
> p.s. - Mark - has my paypal payment cleared for the pal chip 3024
> upgrade? thanks - robert
Many of the GIME addresses can't be read. $FF90 returns non-usable
results which is why both Basic and OS-9 keep images of values sent to
this address rather than trying to read it.
More information about the Coco