[Coco] Weird errors

Willard Goosey goosey at virgo.sdc.org
Wed Sep 13 04:22:15 EDT 2006



>From: Leon Howell <puritan_2076 at yahoo.com>

>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:47:52 +0000 (UTC)

>

>Thanks for the help. I think I'll just use the old compatible commands, and

>see if I can find Reminder.lzh. I'm using Ar2, so it was probably archived

>using Ar 1.3


I played with that last night, and got reminder.ar to uncompress using
ar1.5 I didn't even know I had that version. And yes, reminder.lzh
is the same thing.

I'll put ar1.5 on my webpage http://www.sdc.org/~goosey and let me
know if you need me to email it to you.


>Syscalls? Setstats? XMode and TMode? What idiot named this weird half

>complete language "basic" anyway?

>

Ah, you haven't seen nothin' yet. Under CP/M I can show you some
true obscenities calling themselves "BASIC".

Besides, BASIC-09's complexities are just the result of running under
a real OS that provides real, complicated services to the user
programs. Sure, they *could* have spent 20 or 30K of RAM hiding the
OS's power from the user, but would that have really been useful?


>And where can I get a copy of Burke & Burke RSB - The only version of Basic

>available for OS-9?


Try Brother Jeremey. It's my understanding he inheritied B&B's
remaining stock. Or maybe it was the Glenside club? There was also
something called "RUSTY" which was supposed to be like RSB, but I
don't know where you can find that. (Rusty was last seen advertised by
Northern Xposure.)

If you really want to be useful, you could port ByWater BASIC to
OS-9. I think the code can be compiled with a K&R compiler, so it
shouldn't actually be too hard.

>

>Oh well, enough complaining. No offence intended if you actualy

>*like* "basic"-09.

>

It does have its flaws, but as BASICs go it's pretty nice.

Willard
--
Willard Goosey goosey at sdc.org
Socorro, New Mexico, USA
"I've never been to Contempt! Isn't that somewhere in New Mexico?"
--- Yacko



More information about the Coco mailing list