[Coco] [----] Re: Error codes on SECB

[Jim Cox]

SA = Spam Assassin?  Do you run your own mail server?

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:30:01 -0500
  Gene Heskett <gene.heskett at verizon.net> wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 14:52, Jim Cox wrote:
>>Note that some where in this thread, that the subject was
>>appended with the name of a certain canned meat and was
>>trapped in my filters.  It may be trapped in other 
>>peoples
>>filters too.
>>
> Humm, hasn't happened here Jim, and SA is doing a quite 
>decent job 
> overall.
> 
>>-Jim
>>
>>On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:07:35 -0600
>>
>>  "Bill Collins" <bilge at motleydeercamp.com> wrote:
>>> I'm glad you asked the question Mark.  I've been
>>>following along (as best I
>>> can) and I was wondering the same thing.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Mark Mellor" <markmbm at jps.net>
>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:01 AM
>>> Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>
>>>> Thanks, I realized after I sent the email that the ECB
>>>>part probably
>>>> stands
>>>> for Extended Color Basic.  Anyway, it looks like you
>>>>have solved the
>>>> mystery.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca>
>>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:45 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>>
>>>>> Mark Mellor wrote:
>>>>> > What does SECB stand for?  In my book it says "File
>>>>>
>>>>>not found" for the
>>>>
>>>> NE
>>>>
>>>>> > error but it looks like you already know that with
>>>>>
>>>>>your sample code.
>>>>>
>>>>> SECB=Super Extended Color Basic
>>>>>
>>>>> That is, "Extended Basic 2.0" from a CoCo3.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Mark
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> > From: "Diego Barizo" <diegoba at adinet.com.uy>
>>>>> > To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>>>>
>>>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:07 PM
>>>>> > Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> I checked on the "Quick reference guide" and the NE
>>>>>
>>>>>error is not
>>>>
>>>> listed.
>>>>
>>>>> >> Also, this short program gives no number
>>>>> >> 10  ON ERR GOTO 1000
>>>>> >> 20 LOAD"PPPP"
>>>>> >> 30 STOP
>>>>> >> 1000 ? ERNO,ERLIN
>>>>> >> 1010 END
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> If I change line 20 for WOAD "PP" I get the expected
>>>>>
>>>>>results for an SN
>>>>>
>>>>> > error
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> BUT... If after the first program ends, I type ?
>>>>>
>>>>>ERNO, I do get 26 as
>>>>>
>>>>> >> answer... :-/
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> William Astle wrote:
>>>>> >>> Diego Barizo wrote:
>>>>> >>>> While debugging a program, I noticed that some
>>>>>
>>>>>errors just don't
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>> generate an error code, like "NE error"
>>>>> >>>> Is there anywhere I could "peek" to identify this
>>>>>
>>>>>error?
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>> And out of curiosity, does anyone know why some
>>>>>
>>>>>errors are not
>>>>>
>>>>> > included?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>>> ( I seen to remember another error that did not
>>>>>
>>>>>generate an error
>>>>
>>>> code,
>>>>
>>>>> >>>> but just can't remember which one)
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I thought NE was error code 26 (Unravelled book
>>>>>
>>>>>confirms.)
>>>>
>>>> Interestingly
>>>>
>>>>> >>> enough, NE is defined by Extended Basic even though
>>>>>
>>>>>most folks would
>>>>>
>>>>> >>> only encounter it when using Disk Basic.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Unless you're doing something odd, all errors go
>>>>>
>>>>>through the same
>>>>>
>>>>> >>> handling process so ERRNO should provide the error
>>>>>
>>>>>code (assuming ON
>>>>
>>>> ERR
>>>>
>>>>> >>> GOTO in effect). The only special handling I see in
>>>>>
>>>>>the error
>>>>>
>>>>> >>> routines
>>>>> >>> is for some weird case of a UL error. (Note that if
>>>>>
>>>>>you aren't doing
>>>>
>>>> ON
>>>>
>>>>> >>> ERR GOTO, you won't get the error code stored
>>>>>
>>>>>anywhere.)
>>>>>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Coco mailing list
>>>>> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> William Astle
>>>>> finger lost at l-w.ca for further information
>>>>>
>>>>> Geek Code V3.12: GCS/M/S d- s+:+ !a C++ UL++++$ P++ L+++
>>>>>!E W++ !N w---
>>>>> !D !M PS PE V-- Y+ PGP t+@ 5++ X !R tv+@ b+++@ !DI D? G
>>>>>e++ h+ y?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 -
>>>>Release Date: 11/16/2006
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> 
> -- 
> Cheers, Gene
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to 
>the above
> message by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights 
>reserved.
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco