[Coco] [SPAM] Re: Error codes on SECB
Bill Collins
bilge at motleydeercamp.com
Sat Nov 18 02:07:35 EST 2006
I'm glad you asked the question Mark. I've been following along (as best I
can) and I was wondering the same thing.
Thanks,
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Mellor" <markmbm at jps.net>
To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
> Thanks, I realized after I sent the email that the ECB part probably
> stands
> for Extended Color Basic. Anyway, it looks like you have solved the
> mystery.
>
> Mark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca>
> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>
>
>> Mark Mellor wrote:
>> > What does SECB stand for? In my book it says "File not found" for the
> NE
>> > error but it looks like you already know that with your sample code.
>>
>> SECB=Super Extended Color Basic
>>
>> That is, "Extended Basic 2.0" from a CoCo3.
>>
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Diego Barizo" <diegoba at adinet.com.uy>
>> > To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>> > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:07 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>> >
>> >
>> >> I checked on the "Quick reference guide" and the NE error is not
> listed.
>> >> Also, this short program gives no number
>> >> 10 ON ERR GOTO 1000
>> >> 20 LOAD"PPPP"
>> >> 30 STOP
>> >> 1000 ? ERNO,ERLIN
>> >> 1010 END
>> >>
>> >> If I change line 20 for WOAD "PP" I get the expected results for an SN
>> > error
>> >> BUT... If after the first program ends, I type ? ERNO, I do get 26 as
>> >> answer... :-/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> William Astle wrote:
>> >>> Diego Barizo wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> While debugging a program, I noticed that some errors just don't
>> >>>> generate an error code, like "NE error"
>> >>>> Is there anywhere I could "peek" to identify this error?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> And out of curiosity, does anyone know why some errors are not
>> > included?
>> >>>> ( I seen to remember another error that did not generate an error
> code,
>> >>>> but just can't remember which one)
>> >>>>
>> >>> I thought NE was error code 26 (Unravelled book confirms.)
> Interestingly
>> >>> enough, NE is defined by Extended Basic even though most folks would
>> >>> only encounter it when using Disk Basic.
>> >>>
>> >>> Unless you're doing something odd, all errors go through the same
>> >>> handling process so ERRNO should provide the error code (assuming ON
> ERR
>> >>> GOTO in effect). The only special handling I see in the error
>> >>> routines
>> >>> is for some weird case of a UL error. (Note that if you aren't doing
> ON
>> >>> ERR GOTO, you won't get the error code stored anywhere.)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Coco mailing list
>> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Astle
>> finger lost at l-w.ca for further information
>>
>> Geek Code V3.12: GCS/M/S d- s+:+ !a C++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ !E W++ !N w---
>> !D !M PS PE V-- Y+ PGP t+@ 5++ X !R tv+@ b+++@ !DI D? G e++ h+ y?
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 - Release Date: 11/16/2006
>
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list