[Coco] hard drive questions

L. Curtis Boyle curtisboyle at sasktel.net
Mon Jun 12 16:49:23 EDT 2006


On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:00:37 -0600, Chester A. Patterson  
<vchester at setec-cr.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've collected some hard drives for when I get an IDE adapter. Thye have  
> the
> ubiquitous standard dual in-line 40 pin connector. They were pulled from
> (I'm told) working 286 and 386 PCs.
>
> The Conner I think is dead 'cause it sounds like it speeds up and slows
> down, after 5-10 minutes it appears to settle into a fixed speed. Intel  
> BIOS
> doesn't even acknowledge its existence. The Quantum is my favorite for
> eventual use with Coco but Intel BIOS returns "NOT IDE Compatible Disk"
> Google search finds very little on this specific model, others similar  
> yes.
> The Seagate is RLL. I guess I need a special interface for it. Haven't
> plugged it into the PC.
>
> Quantum HD LPS270A 257mb "AT interface" 12ms  Cyl.944 (800) Hd.14 Sec.40
> Seagate HD ST157A1 45mb "AT interface" RLL (2,7) Cyl.560 Hd.6 TPI.824
> Conner HD CP30061 "AT interface" Type 55
>
> How to check them? Should I toss or keep? Thanks!
>
> /Chester Patterson
>
    If you end up running an IDE driver that supports the last options I  
did on it, the Detect IDE program I wrote for it should be able to tell  
you if it will work or not. Some older IDE drives did not exactly follow  
the spec (and lied about things like cylinders, sectors and heads), but  
you can still get them to work by forcing the device descriptor to what  
the drive _really_ wants to work with.
     An RLL drive would probably be the old 2 cable XT style, wouldn't it?  
If it is, it should work with some of the older PC compatible hard drive  
controllers (like the Burke&Burke; I ran a 65MB RLL drive on that for  
years).
     The driver I did also had the advantage of being able to use a hard  
drive that had problems on cylinder 0; you could just set the start track  
of the drive to a higher #, and it would skip the bad cylinder(s)  
altogether. I don't know if I would recommend this with critical data (bad  
tracks, depending on the cause, may spread over time), but I did get a  
Seagate 20 GB with a bad track 0 to work with it (and it wouldn't work on  
a PC at all).




-- 
L. Curtis Boyle



More information about the Coco mailing list