[Coco] Re: Minesweeper

Robert Gault robert.gault at worldnet.att.net
Tue Feb 7 22:55:22 EST 2006


Before you get all excited, the numbers are 45 out of 338 not 45 out of
52. No one is going to deselect 293 for Minesweeper.

Frederick D Provoncha wrote:

>>Message: 5

>>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:04:55 -0500

>>From: "Mike Moore" <mikmoore at math.carleton.ca>

>>Subject: Re: [Coco] Minesweeper

>>To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"

>><coco at maltedmedia.com>

>>Message-ID: <006401c62bf7$dd2c1cd0$85157586 at mikemoore>

>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>>

>>Yes, but in that case you select 7 of the 52 by the "dart" process

>>and then

>>use the remaining 45. For less than half you keep the selected ones,

>>for

>>more than half you throw them away and use the remainder. For

>>exactly 1/2,

>>use either!

>>

>>Mike Moore

>

>

> Exactly! Instead of selecting 45 out of 52 using the dart method, start

> out with them all "selected", and then "unselect" 7 at random using the

> dart method! Brilliant, Mike! That would be *much* faster.

>

> Fred Provoncha

> Stansbury Park, UT

>




More information about the Coco mailing list