[Coco] Re: Minesweeper
robert.gault at worldnet.att.net
Tue Feb 7 22:55:22 EST 2006
Before you get all excited, the numbers are 45 out of 338 not 45 out of
52. No one is going to deselect 293 for Minesweeper.
Frederick D Provoncha wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:04:55 -0500
>>From: "Mike Moore" <mikmoore at math.carleton.ca>
>>Subject: Re: [Coco] Minesweeper
>>To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>Message-ID: <006401c62bf7$dd2c1cd0$85157586 at mikemoore>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>Yes, but in that case you select 7 of the 52 by the "dart" process
>>use the remaining 45. For less than half you keep the selected ones,
>>more than half you throw them away and use the remainder. For
> Exactly! Instead of selecting 45 out of 52 using the dart method, start
> out with them all "selected", and then "unselect" 7 at random using the
> dart method! Brilliant, Mike! That would be *much* faster.
> Fred Provoncha
> Stansbury Park, UT
More information about the Coco