[Coco] RE: [Color Computer] Looking for a Coco I 64k?
Arthur Flexser
flexser at fiu.edu
Sat Nov 12 15:14:49 EST 2005
I made that statement about a machine TANDY SOLD as 32K, which excludes the
32K obtained by piggybacking 2 sets of 16K chips, which naturally would not be
capable of 64K. I never heard of anyone piggybacking 32K chips to obtain 64K,
if that's what you meant, but that certainly wouldn't apply to a machine sold as
32K by Tandy.
Art
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 PaulH96636 at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/12/2005 4:15:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> flexser at fiu.edu writes:
>
> >I never heard of anyone having to replace the RAMs in order to get 64K
> operation in
> >a machine Tandy sold as 32K.
>
>
>
>
> That's exactly what had to be done in at least one case: Key-264K made
> full use of the
> 64k environment in Basic, by adding 15 more commands. It required having
> prime 64k
> chips, not the piggybacked 32k variety. I still have the Key-264K program
> on tape (came
> on disk as well), but unfortunately the author seems to want to keep the
> program out of
> further circulation. too bad for those of us who might be interested.
> Perhaps if enough
> Coco-ers tried writing to the author he'd be responsive...?
>
> For more on what Key-264k could do, check out Key Color Software advertising
> in mid-
> '80s Rainbow magazines.
>
> -ph
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list