[Coco] C-Cubed

[jdaggett at gate.net]

Boisy

I can do some C not a lot. I really don't like the language that much. So far all that I 
want to do can be done in Assembly, Basic or Fortran77. 

What I have against that kind of reminds me of my past work environment. The way 
the network was setup no one worked local. All work was done via servers and 
lincense servers and if either go bogged down or the links lost you sat there doing 
nothing. 

If I were to do any work in C, I would want to be able to compile locally. The thought 
of having to wait on a server somewhere in mid America just bothers me.

james

On 20 Jul 2005 at 20:28, Boisy G. Pitre wrote:

From:           	"Boisy G. Pitre" <boisy at boisypitre.com>
Subject:        	Re: [Coco] C-Cubed
Date sent:      	Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:28:54 -0500
To:             	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
Send reply to:  	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>

> 
> On Jul 20, 2005, at 8:30 PM, jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
> 
> > Okay
> >
> > I will stay with assembler and Basic. Not going to compile code over
> > the internet on a remote server.
> >
> > james
> 
> james,
> 
> I didn't realize you could program in C!
> 
> I have reason to believe that such a setup would be reasonably  
> acceptable, depending upon the size of the source file.  It could 
> even be made more efficient if the compiler's output would flow 
> directly to the input of the optimizer on the same server, then the 
> output of the optimizer would flow back to the client.
> 
> Like I said, it's an idea.  In the end, I'm not sure what I will do.  
> I suspect that with the changes and mods planned for the compiler, it 
> will be more of a derivative work.
> 
> Boisy
> 
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco