[Coco] Re: UseNet *"Bit.Listserv.CoCo"* NewsGroup elimination
Stephen H. Fischer
SFischer1 at MindSpring.com
Mon Mar 29 22:44:45 EST 2004
I agree that mugged address are required and thus only a one way passing of
When things quiet down, I think that we should continue this discussion.
One thing that our present setup does not provide is the ability for people
to lurk with little effort and with no indication that they are reading the
B.L.CoCo being carried by many (I hope many more than the list I compiled)
ISP's allows people to read B.L.CoCo just like others provided by their
With Earthlink being so big, just them is a great plus.
With just a few clicks they can read B.L.CoCo without doing anything
different. CoCoers being smart they will be able to join us if they wish to
contribute to the discussion.
The numbers of people reading B.L.CoCo in the past before SPAM is totaly
unknown as they did not appear anywhere unless they posted a message.
Stephen H. Fischer <sfischer1 at mindspring.com>
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> At 12:21 AM 3/29/04 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>> I have no idea if any have actually been eliminated.
More information about the Coco