[Coco] Test

[peak at mail.polarcomm.com]

Yep
The mc86008 is NOT compatible with mc6809 and so calling a 
Pseudo CPU by the name MC68009 may not be a good idea.
I really would like to see a 6809 compatible CPU with more 
address lines though, wouldn't you?


---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:06:02 -1000
>From: Theodore (Alex) Evans <alxevans at concentric.net>  
>Subject: Re: [Coco] Test  
>To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
>
>
>On Jan 5, 2004, at 11:29 AM, peak at mail.polarcomm.com wrote:
>
>> Bill
>> A coco4 Emulator??
>> How about a CPU which doesn't exist. Call it a MC68009?
>> 32-bit registers and 20 or so address lines?
>> Waaaay Cool!!
>
>Except that it is not MC6809 compatible, sound a lot like an 
MC68008.
>
>
>-- 
>Coco mailing list
>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco