[Coco] Re: Coco Repack
KnudsenMJ at aol.com
KnudsenMJ at aol.com
Sat Aug 7 22:36:28 EDT 2004
In a message dated 8/7/04 10:09:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
kevdig at hypersurf.com writes:
> Forgive my stupidity, but why does reallocating the bits in the
> address cut the max memory to 1 Meg (from 2?)?
Let's assume you restrict the MMU registers to 8 bits, so process DAT images
can be stored in one byte per segment. 8 bits means 256 total RAM segments,
no more!
Currently those are 8K apiece, times 256 = 2 Megs.
Many of us once longer for smaller segments, like 4K, but times 256 is only 1
Meg total.
It's a tradeoff between total RAM size and segment sizes. After a lot of
public head bashing against the walls, some years ago we concluded that Tandy's
original design of 8K wasn't so bad after all.
Besides, it's what the DEC PDP-11 family used -- the machines where UNIX was
nurtured, if not born. --Mike K.
More information about the Coco
mailing list