[Coco] OS9Boot position, what?
bdevries at gil.com.au
Wed Aug 11 19:48:25 EDT 2004
OS9/68K pre version 2.;4 didn't have it either.
Regards, Bob Devries. Dalby, Queensland, Australia.
Faith isn't faith until it's all you're holding on to.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allen Huffman" <alsplace at pobox.com>
To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Coco] OS9Boot position, what?
> Boisy --
> Supporting fragmented bootfiles, like non-6809 OS-9 does, would be WELL
> worth it (though, it should be a moot point with all the utils that
> exist to prevent it from being an issue). BUT, it sure would be neat
> to be able to:
> merge files files files files >bootfile
> klink bootfile
> ...and be done. Did 68K OS-9 start out with the fragmented file
> support in 1983, do you know?
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
More information about the Coco