[Coco] MM/1 question
Gene Heskett
gene.heskett at verizon.net
Thu Nov 6 23:24:00 EST 2003
On Thursday 06 November 2003 23:09, Bob Devries wrote:
>Gene Heskett said:
>> >Booting from non-contigous bootfile
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> this may be its downfall. Unforch, I do not know enough about the
>> os9 for the mm1 to know if it can boot from a non-contiguous
>> bootfile.
>
>Nope, the other drive boots fine from a (1) extended (>64K)
> bootfile, and (2) a fragmented bootfile.
>LSN0 points to the FD on the OS-9/68K systems, not the file itself.
>
>> I suppose the file could be moved inward to a location that would
>> allow it to be contiguous, and LSN0 then edited to reflect the new
>> location. This might work if that os9 is similar enough to level
>> one or two.
>
>Actually, as it happens, the file IS contigous.
>
Then how come the bootloader said it wasn't? Odd, at least...
>Regards, Bob Devries; Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III at 500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP at 1400mhz 512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
More information about the Coco
mailing list