[arg_discuss] ARGs for children?
D B Wall
dbwall at mac.com
Thu Jul 5 19:09:45 EDT 2007
Enforcement of COPA was blocked by a permanent injunction earlier this year.
I'd seek legal counsel before launching something, but wouldn't shelve an idea over COPA concerns.
On Friday, June 29, 2007, at 12:25PM, "Brian Clark" <bclark at gmdstudios.com> wrote:
>>Speaking of curtains and magic circles, have any of you done an ARG
>>intended for an audience under 14 years old?
>
>Wendy,
>
>In the US at least, I don't advise it. The laws are very complex -- the
>"Child Online Protection Act" (frequently abbreviated COPA).
>
>Key COPA provision: if you utilize any technique online that provides an
>avenue by which children could end up making personally identifiable
>information available to others and they are 14 or under ... you need a
>signed permission sheet from their parents.
>
>In practice: child-focused development tends to avoid direct "community"
>models -- if you let kids chat or BBS with each other, they could end up
>saying something that is natural but violates COPA (like "I'm Susie Bradshaw
>and I live in Tuscan, AZ. Where do you live?")
>
>That presents a challenge to the typical collaborative models that ARGs rely
>on. You see people trying "magnetic word" chat (where you can only drag
>particular words into a chat bubble, never individual letters). You see
>people experimenting with "massively single player" or with models that
>require less collaboration.
>
>Raises the question, "Would it still be an ARG if you couldn't really talk
>to the other players or know anything about their real lives?"
>
>
>Brian
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ARG_Discuss mailing list
>ARG_Discuss at igda.org
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/arg_discuss
>
>
More information about the ARG_Discuss
mailing list